Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48155 (CAL)

TARU SEN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3497/2026 · 2026-10-09

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.10.2026 Item No.83 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3497 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Nalhati Police Station Case No. 20 of 2026 dated 12.01.2026 under Sections 85/109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, BIrbhum. And In the matter of : Taru Sen ...… petitioner Mr. Bitasok Banerjee, Advocate Ms. Debangana Bhattacharya, Advocate .…for the petitioner Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Advocate Mr. Arup Kr. Bhowmick, Advocate .…for the State 1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record. 2. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail. 3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. Police filed charge-sheet. 5. Case diary does not contain any injury report. 6. Allegations as against the petitioner are general and omnibus in nature. 7. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 8. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 9. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 10. CRM(A) 3497 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:32:55 +05'30'