Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48152 (CAL)

DWIJESH KUMAR SARKAR v. KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

WPA/22983/2026 · 2026-10-05

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.10.2026 sayandeep Sl. No. ML 16 Ct. No. 03 WPA 22983 of 2026 Dwijesh Kumar Sarkar Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation. & ors. Mr. Mani Sankar Chakraborty Mr. S. Chatterjee …. for the petitioner Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee Ms. Gulnaz Quraishi ….. for the KMC 1. On 17th September, 2026, this Court has been pleased to pass the following order: “The affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record. The petitioner seeks review of the annual valuation after evaluating and by issuing rate card in respect of the KMC premises No. 137, Chittaranjan Colony in E.P. No. 53, S.P. No. 551, Dag No. 641(P), Mouza-Bademaur, Ward No. 102, postal address 3/101, Baghajatin Chittaranjan Colony, P.O.- Jadavpur University, P.S.- Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, in the light of nature of relief sought for, let a report be filed by the municipality when the matter is taken up next. List this matter in the combined monthly list of October, 2026 under the heading “Motion”. 2. The report filed by the municipality in Court today is taken on record. 3. From the disclosure made, it would transpire that the petitioner’s authorized representative/authorized person was present in course of hearing. WPA 22983 of 2026 2 4. Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the KMC would submit that the municipality shall make over the certified copy of the assessment order to the petitioner on an expeditious basis. 5. In the light of the disclosure as aforesaid and noting that the rate card has been disclosed by the municipality along with the report and a copy whereof has already been made over to the learned advocate for the petitioner and noting that KMC would make over the certified copy of the order to the petitioner, I am of the view no fruitful purpose will be served in retaining the writ petition pending in the file. The municipality is directed to serve copy of the certified copy of the order to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear if the appeal is filed within six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, the appeal shall be heard on merits in accordance with law subject to compliance of all other formalities. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)