CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. ABDUL RASHID RAHMAN AND 2 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/450/2026 · 2026-04-26
Yarenjungla Longkumer
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4815 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4815 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010013922026
2026:GAU-AS:5743
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/450/2026 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZA, OPPOSITE OF S.B.
DEORAH COLLEGE, 4TH FLOOR, BORA SERVICE, GUWAHATI, DIST.
KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, (REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, MR KAIFI ANAM) VERSUS ABDUL RASHID RAHMAN AND 2 ORS S/O SHAFIUR RAHMAN, R/O VILL. DEURIKUCHI, P.S. BARPETA, P.O.
SONKUCHI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781314 2:SONJIBUL MIRDHA S/O SHUKUR MIRDHA R/O VILL. JARABARI BHALUKABARI P.O. JARABARI P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN 781314 3:SHUKUR MIRDHA S/O BACHACHU MIRDHAR R/O VILL. JARABARI BHALUKABARI P.O. JARABARI P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN 78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA, MR N BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N J DUTTA(R1), MR. M ISLAM(R2,3),MR S A BARBHUYAN(R2,3),MR. SURAJIT DAS(R2,3),MR. B HUSSAIN(R2,3),IMDADUL ISLAM(R1),M RAHMAN(R1),MR N AHMED(R1)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 27.04.2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.
2. The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condoning the delay of 56 days in filing the appeal against the Judgment and Award dated 29.07.2025, passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Barpeta in MAC Case No.101/2023.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the main causes for the delay have been set out at the paragraphs No.3, 4, 5 and 6 of the application.
4. This Court has perused the same and finds that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay of 56 days in filing the appeal.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents has also not objected to the instant applicant.
6. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned.
7. Registry shall register the connected MAC Appeal and thereafter list the same after one week for admission hearing.
8. With the aforesaid direction, the I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant