Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48143 (KAR)

NAGARAJUN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES v. MR G JUGRAJ JAIN

WP/14790/2022 · 2026-01-21

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3545 WP No. 14790 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 14790 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: NAGARJUN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX, SMT. SUNANDA GIRISH, CURRENTLY RESIDING AT E-G 10, BRIGADE PALM GROVE, BOGADI, MYSURU - 570 026 THROUGH HER GPA HOLDER, MR. NAGARJUNA GIRISH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. G. JUGRAJ JAIN SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1(A). SMT. PREM LATHA S/O LATE SRI. G. JUGRAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS NO.22, 1ST FLOOR, PILLAPPA LANE MARUTHI MANSION, NAGARTHPET BANGALORE - 560 002. 1(B). SMT. LALITHA D/O LATE SRI. G. JUGRAJ JAIN - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3545 WP No. 14790 of 2022 AGGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/OF NO. 604, A BLOCK, 6TH FLOOR ASTER BLOCK, MAGADI ROAD OPP TO ANGALAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE VTC BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 023. 1(C). SMT. M. ARUNA CHOUDHARY D/O LATE DRI. G. JUGRAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.72, KANCHAN NIVAS, 1ST MAIN 7TH CROSS, A V ROAD, CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE - 560 018. 1(D). SRI. PRAKASH CHAND J S.O LATE SRI. G. JURAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/OF NO.2, MAA NIVAS G K TEMPLE STREET CHIKPETE, BENGALURU CITY KARNATKA - 560 053. 1(E). SMT. VANDANA D/O LATE SRI. G. JUGRAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.11, 1ST FLOOR, L R ROAD CROSS D K LANE, CHIKPETE BANGALORE - 560 053. 1(F). SMT. RKHA MEHTA D/O LATE SRI. JUGRAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/OF NO. 1202 D BLOCK, ETA GARDEN NEAR BINNY MILL, BANGALORE NORTH MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 023. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3545 WP No. 14790 of 2022 1(G). SRI. ANANDKUMAR S/O LATE SRI. G. JUGRAJ JAIN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS BUSINESS AT DEEPAM ELECTRICALS NO.11, S V LANE CHIKPET BANGALORE - 560 053. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YASHASVI S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SURESH V, ADVOCATE FOR R1(G); VIDE ORDER DATED 17.02.2025, NOTICE TO R1 (A-F) ARE DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 13.04.2022 PARTLY ALLOWING I.A.NO.2/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 29 R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE LXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN MISC.NO.25002/2022, IN SOFAR AS THE CONDITION IMPOSED DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO DEPOSIT 50 PERCENT OF RS.14,39,840/- ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3545 WP No. 14790 of 2022 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the petition has become infructuous since the impugned order passed in Misc.No.25002/2022 and Misc.No.25002/2022 has subsequently been dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 14.03.2024. 2. The petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE RJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA