Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
08.10.2026 Serial no. 257 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 3650 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Ghola PS Case No. 379 of 2025 dated 17.11.2025 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/324(4) of the BNS [GR No. 8744 of 2025].
-And-
In the matter of : Sumitra Roy
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Subhadeep Chatterjee Ms. Arpita Kundu Mr. Nilabha Roy Mr. B. Roy
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Indradip Das Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with the criminal case on the ground of some overacts which do not contribute to the substantive offence. The principal offender is already in custody. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the victim. I have taken into account the overall materials in the instant case and having considered that the petitioner is
2 a lady, I am in the background and facts of the present case is of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Sumitra Roy] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge-sheet has been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of six months from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3650 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3