Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48137 (MAD)

LAKSHMANAN v. SABARI VIKRAM

CMP/216/2026 · 2026-07-13

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.216 of 2026 in C.M.A.Sr.No.202564 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH , J Notice to respondents 1 and 2 is dispensed with, since they remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. Mr.B.Sivakollapan, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of 3rd respondent. 2.This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 118 days in filing the above appeal. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the records. 4.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 118 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. 5.Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.B.Sivakollapan, learned counsel, at the time of admission. 6.The learned counsel for the appellant is directed to served the papers on the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 7.It is made clear that for the period of delay of 118 days, the appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 13.07.2026 ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis