Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48118 (MAD)

B.V.RAMESH v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/25911/2026 · 2026-07-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25911 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 25911 of 2026 B.V.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar, Anaikattu Taluk, Anaikattu, Vellore District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue a separate patta to the petitioner in respect of the petitioner’s properties in Survey No.87/1E to an extent of 8 1/2 cents and 88/2A to an extent of 6 cents (2616 Sq.ft- Plot) in pursuant to the document Nos.1790 and 1791 dated 23.04.2025 respectively which is situated at Pulimedu Revenue Village, Anaikattu Taluk, Vellore District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Samivel For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.05.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 19.05.2026 before the respondent, seeking to issue https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25911 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 separate patta to the petitioner in respect of his properties in Survey No.87/1E to an extent of 8 1/2 cents and 88/2A to an extent of 6 cents (2616 Sq.ft- Plot) in pursuant to the document Nos.1790 and 1791 dated 23.04.2025 respectively, which is situated at Pulimedu Revenue Village, Anaikattu Taluk, Vellore District. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 19.05.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25911 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: The Tahsildar Anaikattu Taluk, Anaikattu, Vellore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25911 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 25911 of 2026 08-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis