Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 481 (GAU)

ABUB @ ABU AHMED MAZUMDAR v. STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

Crl.Pet./323/2026 · 2026-03-09

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010044132026 2026:GAU-AS:3493 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./323/2026 ABUB @ ABU AHMED MAZUMDAR S/O- MOHIBUR RAHMAN MAZUMDAR, R/O- 08, ITKHOLA, BASGHAT, SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788002. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY P.P, ASSAM, GHY-1 2:THE OFFICER INCHARGE SILCHAR POLICE STATION P.O AND P.S- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 3:THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER SILCHAR POLICE STATION P.O AND P.S- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 4:AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LUNKARANSAR BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER SHOP NO.152 NEW DHAN MANDI LUNKARANSAR DIST- BIKANER Page No.# 2/4 RAJASTHAN PIN-334603. 5:AU SMALL FINANCE BANK PHASE NO.VII MOHALI BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER SCF 20 SAS NAGAR PHASE VII DIST- MOHALI PUNJAB PIN-160059. 6:AU SMALL FINANCE BANK PAWAN PURI BRANCH BIKANER REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER NO. BK9 PAWAN PURI NEAR BIKANER NURSING HOME DISTRICT- BIKANER RAJASTHAN PIN- 334001. 7:PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK KAILASH NAGAR BRANCH DELHI REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER 9/56 SHYAM BLOCK KAILASH NAGAR DELHI 110031 DIST- DELHI PIN-11003 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY, M N RONGMEI,D GONMEI,MRS. R RONGMEI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/4 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 10.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The only grievance of the present petitioner is that despite orders having been passed by the learned Court below for release of the seized money of the petitioner in Zimma, which is lying with different banks, some of the banks have not complied with the said order, and in this regard, the proceedings are continuing before the learned Magistrate for nearly the last two years and accordingly, the petitioner seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the matter, as he is suffering financial loss due to the non-release of his money which amounts to more than Rs. 2 crores. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and the limited prayer, this criminal revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the Court below, where the matter is pending, shall make an endeavour to dispose of the proceedings as early as possible, preferably within a period of 2 (two) months from today. Page No.# 4/4 4. The criminal revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant