Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48090 (KAR)

MRS K CINDRELLA v. MR RAJKUMAR

MFA/3632/2025 · 2026-01-20

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3632 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MRS.K.CINDRELLA, W/O S.RAJKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.100, MTH ROAD (NOW CTH ROAD), THOZHUR VILLAGE, TIRUVALLUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU. ...Appellant (By SRIYUTHS.D.V.SHASHANK AND PRIYA NAGARAJ, Advocates) AND: MRS.RAJKUMAR, S/O LATE N.SAMBASIVAM, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.127, RAJ PALACE MALAR GARDEN, THANEERPANDHAL, KILSIRUPAKKAM, THANDRAMPET, THIRUANNAMALAI, TAMILNADU. ALSO R/AT NO.26, GANDHI ADIGAL SALAI, NEXT TO LE GARDEN HOTEL, KUMBAKONAM. …Respondent MFA.No.3632/2025 -------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 39 of Special Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.2024 passed in MC No.23/2023 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, K.G.F., allowing the petition filed U/S 27(1)(a)(b) of Special Marriage Act. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant Sri. D.V.Shashank, prays for and is granted a week’s time to remove the office objections. If the office objections are not removed within a week, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.20.01.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : NR C By : STE