08.10.2026 36 Court No. 05 (DL) (Suvendu Mukherjee) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (APPELLATE SIDE) WPA 27004 of 2026 Sahar Ali Khan –Versus – The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tapan Datta Guha Ms. Parvej Anam Ms. Rituparna Ghosh Mr. Sourav Sardar …for the petitioner Mr. Soumya Sankar Chini Ms. Ankana Sarkar …..for the State respondents Mr. Animesh Paul …for the private respondents 1) Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2) Learned advocate representing petitioner prays for direction upon concerned police authorities to take steps based on representation made. 3) However, it is submitted on behalf of private respondents that petitioner instituted a suit where private respondents are defendants and pendency of suit before the civil court is not disclosed in this writ petition. 4) State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 5) On posing query to learned advocate representing petitioner as to why pendency of suit is not disclosed in writ petition, liberty is prayed for to withdraw writ petition. 6) In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 7) All parties shall act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)