Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4802 (GAU)

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. MR THOTMAHO HUNGSHI AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/445/2026 · 2026-04-26

Yarenjungla Longkumer

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010279282025 2026:GAU-AS:5742 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/445/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. REGISTERED HEAD OFFICE AT 3, MIDDLETON STREET, CALCUTTA - 700071, REPRESENTED BY THE ASST MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI - 781005. VERSUS MR THOTMAHO HUNGSHI AND 4 ORS S/O NEWMAN HUNGSHI, 2:RIMILAN HUNGSHI D/O THOTMAHO HUNGSHI 3:OWEN HUNGSHI THANSHOKNGAM S/O THOTMAHO HUNGSHI ALL ARE RESIDENT OFDUNGREI HUNGPUNG UKHRUL P. O. P.S. - UKHRUL DISTRICT - UKHRUL MANIPUR. PIN - 795142 RESPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO. 1. 4:MD SIRAJUL HAQUE (DRIVER) S/O LATE KUMAR ALI R/O. - VILLAGE - NO. 3 BOURAHJAHAR P.O. - BECHIMARI P.S. - DOLGAON DISTRICT - DARRANG ASSAM. PIN -784514 Page No.# 2/3 5:MD AMIRUL HAQUE (OWNER) S/O LATE MAZIBUR RAHMAN R/O - VILLAGE - NAMATI NEAR L. P. SCHOOL P.O. - DOIPAM P.S. - DOLGAON DISTRICT - DARRANG ASSAM. PIN -78451 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R D MOZUMDAR, MR. S P SHARMA,MS. C MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR N SARMA(R4,5), MRS K M SAIKIA,MR. P BORAH,R BARMAN(R4,5),L HANGZO(R4,5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 27.04.2026 1. Heard Ms. R. D. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. K. M. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 and Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2. The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condoning the delay of 110 days in filing the appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 23.05.2025, passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonitpur, Tezpur in MAC Case No.41/2024 (D). 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the main causes for the delay have been set out at the paragraphs No.3 to 10 of the application. 4. This Court has perused the same and finds that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay of 110 days in filing the appeal. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has also not objected to the instant applicant. Page No.# 3/3 6. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. 7. Registry shall register the connected MAC Appeal and thereafter list the same after one week for admission hearing. 8. With the aforesaid direction, the I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant