- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3983 RSA No. 642 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 642 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI ANNAPPA S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT ARISHINAGHATTA VILLAGE, HOLEHONNUR HOBLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PATIL JAGADEESH GOUD., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT.H.R.ROOPA W/O SRI H G RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER, SRI H RUDRAPPA S/O SRI MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT ARISHINAGHATTA VILLAGE HOLEHONNUR HOBLI BHADRAVATHI TALUK …RESPONDENT THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.07.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.96/2022 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND BHADRAVATHI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.09.2021 PASSED IN OS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3983 RSA No. 642 of 2025 NO.300/2018 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 74