C CHANDRAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LRS PARIJATHA v. MANIPAL HOUSING FINANCE SYNDICATE LIMITED
WP/15564/2025 · 2026-01-20
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48014 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48014 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3165 WP No. 15564 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 15564 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
C CHANDRAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) REP BY HIS LRS
1(a) PARIJATHA W/O LATE C CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, CHANNAPPA LAYOUT, SHIMOGA-577201.
1(b) C.A SANTHOSH, S/O. LATE C CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, CHANNAPPA LAYOUT, SHIMOGA-577201.
1(c) C. ASHITHA, D/O. LATE C CHANDRAPPA,
Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3165 WP No. 15564 of 2025
(THE NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED AS ASHITHA IS CORRECTED AS ASHRITHA) AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, CHANNAPPA LAYOUT, SHIMOGA-577201.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YOGEENDRA ACHAR B., ADV.) AND:
MANIPAL HOUSING FINANCE SYNDICATE LIMITED (REGISTERED UNDER.............) REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AUTHORIZED OFFICER
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2025 PASSED BY THE DRAT CHENNAIN IN AIR (SA) 230/2021 AND IN IA 520/2022 (DELAY) VIDE ANNEXURE -E AND ALLOW THE APPEAL NO. AIR (SA) 230/2021 AND IA 520/2022 (DELAY), REMAND THE MATTER TO THE DRT BANGALORE FOR FRESH DISPOSAL OF THE MATTER ON MERIT OF THE CASE, AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3165 WP No. 15564 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER The writ petition was filed in the year 2025. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the petitioners have not complied with the office objections.
2. Today, the case is posted for compliance of office objections for seventh time. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in complying with the office objections.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB