Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4801 (KAR)

M/S CMA CONVENTION HALL v. NKGSB CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/7239/2025 · 2026-04-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21651 WP No. 7239 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 7239 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S CMA CONVENTION HALL A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, HAVING ITS PRINCIPLE PLACE OF BUSINESS AT NO. 19, BAZAR STREET, NAGWARA MAIN ROAD, KADUGONDANAHALLI, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU 560 045. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR YAHIA CHEKKUMARAKARA AKKARAVALAPPIL &PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASUDEVAN H.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NKGSB CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD., A MULTI STATE CO OPERATIVE BANK, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT MUMBAI, AND HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR, NEW NO. 15, (OLD NO. 458 AND 459) 4TH T BLOCK, 18TH MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY 2. N.ANANDA MURTHY S/O LATE T.H.NARAYANA SWAMY Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21651 WP No. 7239 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 331, THANISANDRA, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077 3. VINAYA A., S/O N ANANDA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT RESIDING AT NO. 331, THANISANDRA, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077 4. SMT. DIVYA A., D/O N.ANANDA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT RESIDING AT NO. 331, THANISANDRA, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077 &RESPONDENTS (R1 IS SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE NOTICE DATED: 11.02.2025 STYLED AS VACATE NOTICE AT ANNEXURE-A AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21651 WP No. 7239 of 2025 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the writ petition stating that the respondent No.1/Bank has agreed to settle the matter by accepting the One Time Settlement proposal offered by the petitioner. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12