Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48001 (CAL)

SHYAMAL MAITY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26398/2026 · 2026-10-08

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 14 Court No. 05 (DL) (Suvendu Mukherjee) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (APPELLATE SIDE) WPA 26398 of 2026 Shyamal Maity –Versus – The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury ….for the petitioner Mr. Abhijit Ray Ms. Oisani Mukherjee …for the State respondents 1) Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2) By presenting this writ petition, prayer for quashing of FIRs is made. 3) However, Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Advocate representing petitioner appears on virtual mode and submits that petitioner has obtained bail from appropriate forum and as such prayer for quashing of FIRs which are impugned in this writ petition is not pressed. However prayer is made for disclosure of other FIRs, if pending against petitioner. 4) State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 2 5) In view of submission made on behalf of petitioner, Superintendent of Police, Purba Medinipur being respondent no. 3 is directed to intimate petitioner number of FIRs pending against him as on date with necessary particulars excepting FIRs impugned in this writ petition, by forwarding a communication to petitioner within fortnight from date. 6) Writ petition stands disposed of. 7) Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)