119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9492-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 Ranbir (since deceased) through his LRs and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate for Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel, at the outset, has stated that objections have been received under Section 21(2) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, as applicable to State of Haryana, and that all objections which have been received from the petitioners and others would be decided within a period of 02 months from today. 2. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel that all the objections which have been received under Section 21(2) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.31 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh CWP-9492-2026 -2- as applicable to State of Haryana, would be decided within a period of 02 months, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands disposed off as such. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 30.03.2026 jk ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2026.03.31 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh