IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 784/2026 Decided on: 08.01.2026 Rajesh Kumar ….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Rahul Gathania, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 31.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of Vikram Singh Vs. HRTC.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, decided a/w connected matters on 09.11.2023 2 Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 08th January 2026(rohit)