Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4798 (PAT)

Md. Abuzar @ Abuzar @ Abuzar Khan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2822/2026 · 2026-02-24

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2822 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2025 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Abuzar @ Abuzar @ Abuzar Khan S/o Abu Talib R/o vill - Bagdar, ward no. 7, P.S.- Amour, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 3. As per the prosecution case, a dispute arose over the irrigation of crops, and all the FIR-named accused persons, including the petitioner, assaulted the informant and others with spades and lathis. There is also an allegation of snatching valuables and misbehaving with the victims. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2822 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 overt act against the petitioner, and the specific accusations have been levelled against Md. Shahnawaz, Mahboob, Abu Talib, Kamrul, Nahid, and Ejaz, who are not before this Court. He further submits that the occurrence has taken place because of land dispute and the injuries caused have been found simple in nature. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this application for anticipatory bail stands allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea/concerned Court below in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T