Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4797 (JHR)

PRABHU BASAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2219/2026 · 2026-03-20

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2026:JHHC:7859) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2219 of 2026 Prabhu Basak ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the State : Spl. P.P. --------- 02/20.03.2026 Heard Mr. Abhinav Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Spl. P.P. for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 7156 of 2025. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that five witnesses have been examined by the prosecution out of which four witnesses have been declared hostile. Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring to the evidence of the victim who has been examined as P.W. 2 has submitted that P.W. 2 in her cross examination has categorically stated that the petitioner had not done any wrong with her. Learned counsel adds that the petitioner is in custody since 06.03.2025. Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It appears from the evidence of the victim that she has also stated that the petitioner had caught her hand and had touched her private parts. In view of the above, I am not inclined to reconsider the bail of the petitioner which stands rejected once again. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated, the 20th March, 2026 Pramanik/- Uploaded on 24/03/2026