- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:732-DB WA No. 3705 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 3705 OF 2019 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S UNIVERSAL BUILDERS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM NO.418/9, 1ST FLOOR, GREEN LEAF, LAYOUT, 4TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 034, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. DINESH RAMACHANDRA …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ARJUN RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TENDER SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A STATUTORY BODY UNDER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976, T CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK (WEST) BENGALURU – 560 020 Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:732-DB WA No. 3705 of 2019 2. MFAR DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.3, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 001. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR B S., FOR C/R2; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADV. FOR R1; SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR R3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT DATED 23/08/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.28100/2019; b) ALLOW WRIT PETITION NO.28100/2019 FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT; c) GRANT SUCH AND FURTHER RELIEFS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:732-DB WA No. 3705 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) The learned counsel for the parties are present. The matter concerns grant of a tender. The learned counsel for the respondents states that the matter has been rendered infructuous. As such, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, since learned counsel for the appellant has stated that he has no instructions in the matter, it is left open to the appellant to move an appropriate application for reconsideration within a period of two weeks from today should any cause of action survive. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14