1 / 2 2026:CGHC:16813 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13981 of 2025 • Smt. Purnima Sharma W/o Shri Aashish Sharma Aged About 38 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (Lb), R/o Ward No. 10, Om Bhumi Colony, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Director Directorate Of School Education, Fourth Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Collector Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 5. The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6. The District Education Officer Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 7. The Block Education Officer Block Navagarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Aniruddh Shrivastava, Advocate and Mr. Prabhakar Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents- State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 13/04/2026 1. On the objection being raised by learned State counsel that petitioner has earlier approached this Court by way of filing writ petition bearing WPS No. 12419/2025, which was disposed of directing District Level Committee to consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner. From the documents enclosed along with writ PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.04.13 18:20:20 +0530 2 / 2 petition, Annexure P-10, it is appearing that petitioner submitted representation on 14.11.2025 and therefore second writ petition seeking prayer of directing the District Level Committee to decide claim of petitioner will not be maintainable. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding for redressal of his grievance. 3. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn