Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47954 (KAR)

KALA NIKETHAN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. BANGALORE UNIVERSITY

WP/12511/2023 · 2026-01-07

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:889 WP No. 12511 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 12511 OF 2023 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: KALA NIKETHAN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION NO.42/1, AECS LAYOUT, KUDLU, OFF HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560068, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL RAVI G.S. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH B SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE UNIVERSITY JNANA BHARATHI COMPLEX, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 056 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:889 WP No. 12511 of 2023 2. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHER EDUCATION (NCTE) G-7, SECTOR-10, DWARKA, NEW DELHI-110075, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE. 3. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHER EDUCATION (NCTE) G-7, SECTOR-10, DWARKA, NEW DELHI-110075, REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI. B. PROMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (VK FILED) SRI. M VINOD KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3] THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R1 TO AFFILIATE 100 STUDENTS TO THE B.ED COURSE FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2022-23 CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 05/04/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE G. DIRECTING THE R1 TO PERMIT THE STUDENTS STUDYING IN THE PETITIONERS COLLEGE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE UPCOMING EXAM SCHEDULED BETWEEN 20/06/2023 TO 27/06/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:889 WP No. 12511 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed in the year 2023. The office has raised objections. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner did not comply with the office objections. 2. Today, the petition is listed fifth time for non-compliance of office objections. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As the petition is filed in the year 2023, it seems that that the petitioner is not interested in complying with the office objections. 3. In view of the same, I do not find any grounds to adjourn the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. 4. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA | CT:KHV | List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5