SMT. THANESWARI HAZARIKA AND 3 ORS v. MAHENDRA RAI AND 2 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1094/2026 · 2026-04-26
Robin Phukan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4794 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4794 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010066502026
2026:GAU-AS:5765
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1094/2026 SMT. THANESWARI HAZARIKA AND 3 ORS W/O SRI BABUL CH HAZARIKA, RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR, PANIGAON, MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR, P.S SADAR, PIN- 782003, DISTRICT- NAGAON 2: PABIN CH SAIKIA S/O LATE RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAON 3: GOLAP GAYAN S/O SRI MOHORAM GAYAN RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAON 4: SMT RUPALI KALITA W/O LT. JUGEN KALITA RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAON 5: DHARMESWARI KALITA D/O LT. JUGEN KALITA RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON
Page No.# 2/3 MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAON 6: TAPU KALITA S/O LT. JUGEN KALITA RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAON 7: DIPTI BORA D/O LT. JUGEN KALITA RESIDENT OF RATNAPUR PANIGAON MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S SADAR PIN- 782003 DISTRICT- NAGAO VERSUS MAHENDRA RAI AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE BHANU RAI, A RESIDENT OF VILL- RATNAPUR PANIGAON, MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR, P.S - SADAR, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM 2:AMAL CH. BORA S/O LATE SARU NATH BORA PANIGAON POLYTECHNIC ROAD MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S.- SADAR DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM. 3:DHARMESWAR BORA S/O LATE SARU NATH BORA PANIGAON POLYTECHNIC ROAD MOUZA- NIZ SAHAR P.S.- SADAR DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S R GOGOI, MR. C SARMAH
Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MS B DEVI,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 27.04.2026
Heard Mr. S.R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicants for early hearing of the connected RSA No. 34/2023. 3. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants/respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are old aged persons and as such, there is a requirement for early hearing and disposal of the connected RSA No. 34/2023. 4. Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing this application. 5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to allow this application. 6. Registry shall list the connected RSA No. 34/2023 for hearing on
02.06.2026. 7.
In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant