- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1823 CRL.A No. 954 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 954 OF 2025 BETWEEN: M/S. VANDANA TIE UP PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.139, SHALIMAR GALAXY, 1ST MAIN, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MS. VANDANA JAIN. &APPELLANT (BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: PRAFULLA S. BHAT AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDIT BHAT, HAVING PALCE OF RESIDENCE AT CKP HOLDINGS, NO.1803-1805, 18TH FLOOR, C WING, ONE BKC BANDRA, KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST MUMBAI - 400 015. PRESENTLY HAVING OFFICE AT 406, MALAHPRAPULLA SUBHASHCHANDRA, BHAT BUR DUBAI BURJKHALIFA, DUBAI - 500 001. &RESPONDENT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1823 CRL.A No. 954 of 2025 THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.PC PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LD. XI ADDL. JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES AND CJM, BANGALORE IN C.C.4054/2018 (ANNEXURE-A); AND CONSEQUENTLY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. A memo for withdrawal is filed by the appellant's counsel, in which, it is stated as under; "The Appellant above-named humbly submits as follows: It is submitted that the present appeal is filed seeking to remand C.C. No. 4054 of 2018 matter back to the Ld. XI Addl. Judge of Small Causes and ACJM, Bangalore and try the Respondent for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It is submitted that during the pendency of the present appeal, the Parties have agreed to amicably resolve their disputes through an out-of-court settlement, which has already been acted upon. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1823 CRL.A No. 954 of 2025 WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that the instant memo may be received on record, and the petition may be disposed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of memo for withdrawal, the appellant is permitted to withdraw this case. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. 3. All pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9