Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47934 (KAR)

UDAYA KUMAR v. SMT. GAGANA

WP/14275/2024 · 2026-01-13

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1960 WP No. 14275 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 14275 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: UDAYA KUMAR S/O RAMASANJEEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO. 68, VENKATADRI NIAYA, WARD NO.35, 5TH CROSS, NEAR PUTTA ANJANEYA TEMPLE, MAHALAKSHMI NAGARA, BATWADI - 572 103, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURUPRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. GAGANA W/O UDAYA KUMAR, Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1960 WP No. 14275 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O 1043, SHOBAHA GARRISON APARTMENT, TUMAKUR JROAD, NAGASANDRA, OPP. NAGASANDRA METRO STATION, BENGALURU - 560 073. &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VISHWANATHA K, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10.07.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED V ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU ON I.A. NO.7 AND 8 IN M.C. NO. 4883/2020 DIRECTING HIM TO PAY RS.10,000/- EVERY MONTH TO THE RESPONDENT AND RS.5,000/- PER MONTH TO THE CHILD FOR ITS EXPENSES FROM THE DATE OF APPLICATION TILL DISPOSAL OF THE PETITION AND DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PAY LITIGATION EXPENSES AT RS.30,000/- TO THE RESPONDENT AND HOLDING THAT THE PETITIONER IS ALSO LIABLE TO PAY THE YEARLY FEES OF THE CHILD PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1960 WP No. 14275 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER Sri. Guruprasad Hegde, representing Sri.S.V Prakash learned counsel on record for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the matter is settled amicably between the parties. Memo to that effect is also filed. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74