Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47930 (MAD)

M.Bakkiyakaruppayi v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by

HCP(MD)/784/2026 · 2026-07-08

A D Jagadish Chandira, R Poornima

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HCP(MD) NO.784 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA HCP(MD) No.784 of 2026 M.Bakkiyakaruppayi ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District 2. The Inspector of Police Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District 3. Mano ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the petitioner's daughter minor detenue namely (xxx) aged about 17 years before this Court and handover the custody to the petitioner. For Petitioner : M/s.M.P.Ronica For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu(Crl.Side) ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP(MD) NO.784 of 2026 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.) Alleging that her minor daughter (xxxx) aged about 17 years went missing on 09.06.2026 and that no action was taken by the respondent, despite the registration of a case in Crime No. 164 of 2026 the present petition has been filed by the petitioner. 2. This Court by an order dated 24.06.2026 had directed the respondents to produce the victim before this Court. Pursuant to which the victim has been produced before this Court by the second respondent. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu(Crl.Side) submitted that based on the complaint given by the petitioner that her daughter(xxx) aged about 17 years went missing a case has been registered in Crime No.164 of 2026 under 'Girl Missing'. Later during investigation it was found that the third respondent who is known to the victim had taken her along with him and they were traced at Tanjore. He further submitted that now the case has been altered to Section 9 of Child Marriage Act and Sections 5,6 of POCSO Act and transferred to All Women Police Station for investigation. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP(MD) NO.784 of 2026 4. We enquired the alleged detenue. She expressed her willingness to go along with her mother/petitioner. 5. Recording the same, the Habues Corpus Petition stands closed. [A.D.J.C., J.] & [R.P., J.] 08.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No aav To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District 2. The Inspector of Police Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP(MD) NO.784 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. AND R.POORNIMA , J. aav HCP(MD) No.784 of 2026 08.07.2026 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis