- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:867 RSA No. 835 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 835 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: AVULAPPA S/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BALAKUNTANAHALLI POST, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SMT. REKHA K R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA W/O LATE NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT GUNGIRLAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK. 2. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BALAKUNTANAHALLI POST, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK. 3. C N VENKATESH S/O LATE VENKATASHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WATERMAN IN MUNICIPAL OFFICE, R/O SIDLAGHATTA MUNICIPALITY Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:867 RSA No. 835 of 2024 SIDLAGHATTA 4. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS, WATERMAN IN MUNICIPAL OFFICE R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BALAKUNTANAHALLI POST, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK. 5. SMT NARASAMMA W/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BALAKUNTANAHALLI POST, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK. 6. NARAYANSWAMY S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BALAKUNTANAHALLI POST, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK. 7. ANANDA S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT THABASAMAKANAHALLI, THONDEBAVI HOBLI, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK. 8. M SRINIVAS S/O MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT THIMMAKKA LAYOUT, NEAR APMC MARKET CHIKKABALLAPURA …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.02.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.111/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:867 RSA No. 835 of 2024 CHIKKABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.898/2008 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for VI time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 139