[2026:RJ-JP:13863] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3942/2026 1. Dharamraj @ Dharma S/o Om Prakash, R/o Gaon Jalodi, Thana Talera, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Bundi Jail) 2. Prahlad S/o Gori Shankar, R/o Gaon Mohipuri Ka Barda, Thana Talera, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Bundi Jail). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3943/2026 1. Sangram Singh Urf Sonu S/o Raghuraj Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Hadon Ka Pipalda Thana Talera, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Sub Jail Bundi) 2. Akhraj Singh @ Bittu Bana S/o Raghuraj Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Hadon Ka Pipalda Thana Talera, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Sub Jail Bundi) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma Mr. Narendra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 02/04/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:13863] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3942/2026] 1. The instant second bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused- applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 100/2025 registered at Police Station Talera, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) and 189(2) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that there is material change in circumstances since the rejection of the first bail applications. It is submitted that PW-5 and PW-7, who are the concerned medical officers/doctors, have not supported the prosecution story during their testimonies before the learned Trial Court. It is further submitted that the testimony of PW-4, namely Dhanraj, who was cited as a material witness, is also not supportive of the case of the prosecution. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the second bail applications. It is submitted that the alleged offences are heinous and grave in nature and that the criminal antecedents of the applicants were already duly considered during the rejection of the prior application. It is further submitted that the victim sustained multiple injuries, out of which one was noted to be fatal and life-threatening in nature which caused death of the victim. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and upon assiduous perusal of the previous order dated 25.11.2025 passed by this Court, considering the extreme gravity of the offences and taking note of the fact that the testimonies of the witnesses cannot be meticulously evaluated or subjected to a mini-trial while considering the bail applications; [2026:RJ-JP:13863] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3942/2026] that there is no substantial material change in circumstances to warrant interference in these successive applications, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to allow the second bail applications of the accused- applicants. 5. Accordingly, the instant second bail applications filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 stand dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-167-168