[141] Madan Lal Simranjit S Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] concerned that there i However, the suit exp [2] further dire the disposa [3] [4] disposed of 11.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA CR-9042- Date of De an Lal Vij Versus anjit Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Ashish Nagar, Advocate fo **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Pursuant to Order dated 0 erned quarter has been received. The there is no undue delay attributable to ever, the Court has assured that an end uit expeditiously. In view of the above, this C directions as the concerned Court i isposal of the present suit. Disposed off. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH -2025 (O&M) of Decision : 11.03.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN cate for the petitioner. ated 02.02.2026, report from the . The concerned Court has reported able to the Court in the proceedings. an endeavour will be made to decide this Court finds no reason to issue Court is already alive of the delay in eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No the orted dings. ecide issue lay in tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.11 18:57 I agree to specified portions of this document