APARNA GORAI ALIAS APARNA PAUL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
WPC/1068/2026 · 2026-02-27
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4789 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4789 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5868 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1068 of 2026 ------ Arpana Gorai @ Aparna Paul, wife of Late Swapan Paul aged about 47 years, resident of house No. A/31/241, Jaadugoda P.O. & P.S. Jaadugoda, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-832102. Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi 834004.
2. Principal Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O., Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi
834004.
3. Princial Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative and Rajbhasa Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O., Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi 834004.
4. Jharkhand Staff Selection Committee, through its Secretary, having its Office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, Distict- Ranchi 834010.
5. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its Office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, Distict- Ranchi 834010.
… … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Bhushan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Komal Tiwary, A.C. to A.G.
Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate.
------ 03/27th February, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner appeared for examination pursuant to Advertisement No. 13 of 2023. This advertisement was published to fill up the post for Sahayak Acharya.
3. The result has already been published. Admittedly, the petitioner has obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate in her category and subject. Since the petitioner has obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate in the category and the subject, petitioner has got no right to be appointed.
4. Be it noted, since the process of appointment is still continuing and if it is found at later stage that any person obtaining lesser
marks than the last selected candidates in same category and subject of the petitioner, is appointed, the petitioner will bring the said facts to the notice of J.S.S.C. who will reconsider the case of the petitioner.
5. Thus, I am not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of.
6. Pending I.As., if any also stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
27.02.2026
Amar/-