- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4343 RSA No. 433 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 433 OF 2009 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. S. ANANDA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 2. SHIVARAMA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 3. JAYARAMA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 4. RAVINATHA S/O BABU GOWDA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS ALL ARE LAND OWNERS APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE SONS AND APPELLANT NO.4 IS THE GRAND SON OF LATE S. RAMANNA GOWDA AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT SARALIKANA OF BETTAMPADY VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK POST:BETTAMPADY, D.K …APPELLANTS (ABSENT) AND: 1. HUKRA S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4343 RSA No. 433 of 2009 2. MADANA S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. GURUVA S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 4. KARIYA S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 5. AITHAPPA S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 6. GIRIJA @ AITHI D/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. MONTA @ BABU S/O MUDARA MERA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT SARALIKANA OF BETTAMPADY VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK POST:BETTAMPADY, D.K …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4343 RSA No. 433 of 2009 ORAL ORDER The appeal is listed today for final hearing and the names of the appellants are printed/ shown in the cause list. The names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. The appellants were represented by counsel Sri.S.Viswajith Shetty., as he was elevated to the Bench. This Court vide order dated:28.07.2023, issued Court notice to the appellants. Accordingly, Court notice was issued and they were duly served and same has been taken note of vide order dated:13.09.2023. The Registry has listed the matter and the names of the appellants has been printed in the cause list. As already noted above, the names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. They have not engaged any counsel to represent them in the Court. It appears that the appellants are not interested in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4343 RSA No. 433 of 2009 prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE CH List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15