- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6877 MFA No. 8084 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8084 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. S M NAGARAJ S/O LATE SRI MUNIYAPPA M, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2. S M RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE SRI MUNIYAPPA M, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.126, 1ST MAIN, SINGAPURA VILLAGE, VIDHYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560097 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRAPPA V., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. D MANOHARAN S/O K K DHAYANANDAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. SMT S. SELVI W/O SRI D MANOHARAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.27, 11TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, AKSHAYA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560016. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6877 MFA No. 8084 of 2018 3. M RAMESH S/O SRI MARAPPA, MAJOR, R/AT NO.47, VARADARAJA SWAMY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, SINGAPURA VILLAGE, VIDHYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560097 4. B.W.S.S.B. OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560009 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 5. B.B.M.P NARASHIMARAJA SQUARE, BANGALORE-560002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 6. S M VARADARAJU S/O LATE SRI MUNIYAPPA M, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.126, 1ST MAIN, SINGAPURA VILLAGE, VIDHYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.B.MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R1, R2, R3, R5 AND R6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6877 MFA No. 8084 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. The appeal was listed on 04.02.2026 and there was no representation on behalf of appellants. For appearance of counsel for appellant, it was ordered to be listed on 05.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears on behalf of appellants on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non- prosecution. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. It appears, the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26