IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6163 of 2026 Decided on: 27.04.2026 Sunita Kumari … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of said respondents. Without going into the legality of the order under challenge, in light of the fact that the petitioner is stated to be superannuating in just two years, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a representation within one week from today for his adjustment at some other station, appropriate call thereupon be taken by the competent authority, sympathetically, within three weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Till decision on the representation, the petitioner shall not be forced to join new place of posting and he may be 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 allowed to avail the leave of kind due. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 27, 2026 (narender)