Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47828 (CAL)

RABIUL ISLAM @ MD RABIUL ISLAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/2070/2026 · 2026-10-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L.17. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2070 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 192 of 2026 dated 11.02.2026 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Rabiul Islam @ Md. Rabiul Islam ……Petitioner. Mr. Pramanand Sharma, Ld. APP Mr. Dr. Achin Jana Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh ……for the State. Records of the case reflect that 20 bottles of phensedyl were recovered from the joint possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was arrested on 11.02.2026 and is in custody for about eight months, charge-sheet has been submitted. Learned advocate appearing for the State has submitted a memo of evidence. Memo of evidence do not reflect that there are any criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Having considered the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, the petitioner, namely, Rabiul Islam @ Md. Rabiul Islam shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must 2 be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court (under NDPS Act), 4th Court, Malda. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Malda without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (NDPS) No. 2070 of 2026 is allowed. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)