Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4782 (UTT)

VISHAL DAS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2550/2025 · 2026-01-10

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:522 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 / 2 5 5 0 / 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. 1. Ms. Gyanwati Khushwaha, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Vishal Das, s/ o Shri Vijay Das is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 21.04.2025, bearing FIR No. 109 of 2025, registered at P.S. Transit Camp, District U.S. Nagar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 351(2), 190, 191(3) of BNS 2023. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that co- accused Dharmendra and Himanshu have already been granted bail by this Court, therefore claims parity. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant gives statement at bar that charge sheet has already been filed, and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 6. On the other side, Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State have not disputed this fact that the two co-accused namely Dharmendra and Himanshu have already been enlarged on bail and also submits that the applicant deserves for parity. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and 2026:UHC:522 taking into consideration that the co- accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserve for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant Vishal Das be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant will join the trial court’s proceeding on each and every date without seeking any unnecessary adjournment failing which the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail. ( Rak esh Th apliyal, J.) 1 0 .0 1 .2 0 2 6 Nahid 2026:UHC:522