Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12582 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 12582 of 2026 Karuppayee ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vanniyampatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.114 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ramki Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 114 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(A) of NDPS Act and Section 77 of Juvenile Justice (Care and 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12582 of 2026 Protection of Children) Act, in Crime No.114 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused found in possession of 100 grams of Ganja and she was arrested with contraband. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she was falsely implicated in this case and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Only based on the confession statement of the co-accused she was implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody from 04.06.2026. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel appearing for the State reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner was arrested with contraband and she is having 15 previous case. Investigation in this case is still pending. He opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12582 of 2026 records. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and though the quantity involved in this case falls under the category of small quantity, considering the previous cases and the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail at this stage. 7.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. (K R S J) 29.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Vanniyampatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.114 of 2026) 3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Paramakudi. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12582 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 12582 of 2026 Date : 29.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis