- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6369 OF 2025 BETWEEN: PRAVEEN G D S/O GOPALA KRISHNA DEVANIKARA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS MARKETING OFFICER RASHTRIYA CHEMICALS & FERTILISERS LTD., M L A LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE) AND: AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AND FERTILIZER INSPECTOR RAITHA SAMPARKA KENDRA KUNDANA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU -560001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/SEC.482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1027/2011 PCR NO.119/2010 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI AS AGAINST THIS PETITIONER FOR THE O/P/U/SEC.7 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT FOR CONTRAVENTION OF CLAUSE 19(1)(B) OF FERTILISER (REGULATION) ORDER 1985 AND FERTILISER MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER 1973 AND SECTION 3 OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 seeking quashing of the proceedings pending in C.C.No.1027/2011 arising out of the PCR No.119/2010 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli for the offences punishable under Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act alleging contravention of Clause 19(1)(b) of the Fertilizer (Regulation) Order, 1985 and Fertilizer Movement Control Order, 1973 and Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 2. The petitioner, who is employed as a Marketing Officer with Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited, Mumbai, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the registration of crime and the consequential filing of charge sheet by the Investigating Officer, pursuant to which proceedings have been initiated against him in C.C.No.1027/2011. 3. The principal contention advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the very initiation of criminal proceedings pursuant to a private complaint in P.C.R No.119/2010 is legally unsustainable inasmuch as the petitioner is sought to be prosecuted in his capacity as an employee/Marketing Officer of a Company, without arraying the Company itself as an accused. It is contended that such prosecution is in clear violation of the statutory mandate contained in Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which governs offences committed by companies and prescribes the conditions under which persons in charge of and - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 responsible to the company can be proceeded against. Reliance is placed on the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Petition No.8366/2023, wherein an identical question of law fell for consideration. 4. Elaborating the submission, learned counsel would contend that Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act incorporates the principle of vicarious liability, which can be fastened on officers or employees of a company only when the company itself is prosecuted as the principal offender. In the present case, the petitioner is sought to be prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, allegedly for contravention of Clause 19(1)(b) of the Fertilizer (Regulation) Order, 1985, the Fertilizer Movement Control Order, 1973 and Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act solely in his individual capacity. The Co-ordinate Bench, while interpreting Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 has categorically held that unless the company is arrayed as an accused, its officers or - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 employees cannot be proceeded against on the basis of vicarious liability. The said legal position squarely applies to the facts of the present case. 5. The learned High Court Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent-State, fairly concedes the legal proposition laid down by the Co-ordinate Bench, and does not dispute the applicability of the said judgment to the case on hand. 6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having bestowed anxious consideration to the material on record, as also the judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench in Criminal Petition No.8366/2023, this Court is of the considered view that the prosecution launched against the petitioner is fundamentally defective. The failure on the part of the complainant and the prosecuting agency to array the Company as an accused strikes at the very root of the proceedings rendering them vitiated in law. In the absence of prosecution of the - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 Company, the invocation of Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act against an employee is impermissible. Continuation of such proceedings would not only be contrary to the statutory scheme but would also result in sheer abuse of the process of Court, particularly when the possibility of securing a conviction is virtually non-existent. 7. Therefore, applying the settled principles laid down by the Co-ordinate Bench and in exercise of the inherent powers of this Court to prevent abuse of process and to secure the ends of justice, this Court finds it a fit case to quash the impugned proceedings. 8. In view of the above, this Court proceeds to pass the following; ORDER (i) The Criminal Petition is allowed. (ii) The entire proceedings pending in C.C.No.1027/2011, arising out of P.C.R No.119/2010, on the file of the Principal Civil - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2645 CRL.P No. 6369 of 2025 Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for the alleged contravention of Clause 19(1)(b) of the Fertilizer (Regulation) Order, 1985, the Fertilizer Movement Control Order, 1973 and Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, are hereby quashed. (iii) All consequential proceedings, if any, shall also stand terminated. (iv) Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30