Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 478 (JHR)

MD ARMAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12155/2025 · 2026-03-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7041 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 12155 of 2025 Md. Arman, aged about 25 years, son of Sekh Jumman, resident of Village-Hensadungri, Near Brick Klin, PO-Kapali, PS-Chandil, District- Seraikella (Kharsawan) ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritu Raj, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Prathik, Advocate Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate Mr. Shambhu Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, APP -------- Order No. 03/Dated: 16th March 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 17(b)/21(b)/25 of the NDPS Act in connection with Chandil PS Case No. 174 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. He submits that the petitioner has been apprehended on the allegation that 12.26 gram of brown sugar has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner which falls in the intermediary quantity. He submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 25.10.2025 as such he may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the allegation made against the petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 25.10.2025, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to 2026:JHHC:7041 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Seraikella in connection with Chandil PS Case No. 174 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 16th March 2026 Amit Uploaded on 17/03/2026