Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47796 (CAL)

TANUSHREE GHOSH(MANDAL) v. BHAGYADHAR MANDAL

FAT/41/2024 · 2026-10-08

Rajasekhar Mantha, Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 Ct. No. 7 SL No.29 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI FAT 41 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2022 CAN 3 of 2025 Tanushree Ghosh (Mandal) Vs. Bhagyadhar Mandal Ms. Kanika Sankar … for the appellant. Mr. Sudipta Kanta Bhowmik, Ms. Dipti Bhowmik, Mr. Anirban Banerjee … for the respondent. 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that mediation has not succeeded. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that her client accepted the decree for divorce and does not wish to press the appeal any further. She only claims alimony. 3. Liberty is reserved to the appellant/wife to apply before the trial court for alimony in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the impugned judgment and decree dated 04.04.2019 is confirmed. 5. In view of the above, FAT 41 of 2024 is disposed of. 2 6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)