Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4779 (CAL)

AMIRUL SK. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/436/2026 · 2026-03-27

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.03.2026 Serial no. 90 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 436 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No. 1177 of 2025 dated 18.09.2025 u/s 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS corresponding to GR 4253 of 2025. -And- In the matter of : Amirul Sk. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg Ms. Rita Patra … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. A. Keshari Mr. Akash Ganguly … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and there is no support in the post-mortem report in tune with the accusations leveled against the present petitioner. Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and has drawn the attention of the court to the post- mortem report as also the opinion of doctor. It has also been pointed out that one of the accused is still absconding, as such, the case has not been committed to the court of Sessions. Having considered the conduct of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. 2 However the learned Magistrate in seisin of the case would take steps for splitting up of the trial, if required, and, thereafter, proceed for committal proceedings. Accordingly, CRM(M) 436 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)