Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3759 WP No. 12901 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12901 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
ADITYA. C.K S/O.C.V.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, APC LAYOUT, TINDLU, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. S. AISHWARYA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESHWARA P N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA TUMKUR, TUMAKURU DISTRICT- 572 132
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI 572 132.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, KORATAGERE,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3759 WP No. 12901 of 2025
KORATAGERE TALUK - 572 132.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO REMOVE THE NAME OF SRI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD IN COLUMN NO.9 AND 12(2) AS JOINT KHATEDAR AND SHOW ONLY THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN COLUMN NO.9 AND 12(2) IN THE RTC FOR SY.NO.19/10 MEASURING 3 ACRES OF DEVARAHALLI VILLAGE, C.N DURGA HOBLI, KORTIGERE TALUK DATED 09.09.2024, 05.08.2024 AND 03.08.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE A, A1 AND A2 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate has today filed a memo along with the RTC showing the removal of the name of the vendors from Column No.(9).
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner will be satisfied with the action
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3759 WP No. 12901 of 2025
taken by the respondents, nevertheless because of the huge delay on the part of the respondents, the petitioner has faced a lot of difficulty in selling the property.
3. Nevertheless, having regard to the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/-