Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47770 (MAD)

Chinnapandi v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Palanichettypatti

CRL OP(MD)/13359/2026 · 2026-07-06

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13359 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.07.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 13359 of 2026 Chinnapandi ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Palanichettypatti Police Station, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. (Crime No.345 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Praveenkumar Advocate For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 345 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 336(3), 340(2), 318(4) of BNS, in Crime No.345 of 2026 on the file of the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13359 of 2026 respondent police, seeks bail. 2. . The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was running an authorised e-seva centre and taking advantage of the access to various personal informations, he started to issue various bogus Birth Certificate, also bogus adhar card, etc. The Tahsildar concerned has suo motu inspected the centre and found that the various malpractices have been done by the petitioner along with other accused. Hence, the complaint has been lodged. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is only the employee of the e-seva centre. He is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Counsel for the State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that examination of A1 reveals that several transactions has been taken place for issuance of bogus Birth Certificate, etc. The materials that are used for fabrication of documents such as bogus seals have been recovered. Investigation is in preliminary stage. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13359 of 2026 5.Heard the learned counsel on either sides and perused the materials available on records. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner having access to the various personal datas, involved in malpractices, more particularly issuing bogus Birth Certificate to a candidate by reducing his age more than two years, investigation is in initial stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. (K R S J) 06.07.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Theni. 2.The Inspector of Police, Palanichettypatti Police Station, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. (Crime No.345 of 2026) 3.The Superintendent, District Prison, Thekkampatti, Theni. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13359 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 13359 of 2026 Date : 06.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis