Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47758 (KAR)

SRI. RAJESH GOWDA v. THE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

WP/56941/2018 · 2026-01-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3805 WP No. 56941 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 56941 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJESH GOWDA S/O SHESHAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/AT PROPERTY NO. N-15 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. 2. SMT. B. REKHA W/O RAJESH S. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/AT PROPERTY NO.N-15 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078. 3. SRI. S. NANDAKUMAR S/O D. SOMASUNDARAM AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/AT PROPERTY NO.N-15 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078. 4. SMT. N. LAKSHMI SUJATHA W/O S. NANDAKUMAR Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3805 WP No. 56941 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/AT PROPERTY NO.N-15 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD N, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRLCE, BANGALORE - 560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE 10TH CROSS, 21ST MAIN, J.P. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 5600785. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-F THE IMPUGNED CONFIRMATION ORDER DTD 5.8.2013 UNDER SECTION 321(3) OF THE KMC ACT, 1976 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3805 WP No. 56941 of 2018 ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 05.01.2026, there is no appearance on the part of the petitioners today also. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17