$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 355/2026, CM APPL. 1758/2026 & CM APPL. 1761/2026 ABDUL SAZAD ANSARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaad Anwar, Ms. Shabnam Farooqui, Mr. Jayant Yadav & Mr. Parvez Alam, Advs. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GNCTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat SC GNCTD services, Mr Uday Singh Ahlawat, Mrs Tania Ahlawat, Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms Aliza Alam, Mr Mohnish Sehrawat CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 12.01.2026 CM APPL. 1759/2026 [for exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures and orders], CM APPL. 1760/2026 [for exemption from filing typed / legible copies of the dim / illegible documents] 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 355/2026, CM APPL. 1758/2026 & CM APPL. 1761/2026 3. Through the present Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner assails the correctness of order dated 06.01.2026, passed in M.A./5500/2025 in O.A./4719/2025, whereby the learned Central Administrative Tribunal refused to stay This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:29:47 the transfer order and grant any interim relief to the Petitioner. 4. Undisputedly, Original Application filed by the Petitioner is pending before the learned Tribunal. 5. On 09.01.2026, learned counsel representing the Petitioner relied upon a copy of the alleged Transfer Policy (Annexure-P7). 6. Learned counsel representing the Govt. of NCT of Delhi submits that the document which is annexed as Annexure-P7 is not part of any official document issued by the State, and in fact, is an AI generated document. 7. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner is unable to dispute this fact at this juncture. 8. In such circumstances, considering that the Petitioner has been transferred from one office to another within the city of Delhi, this Court does not find it appropriate to interfere with the impugned order. 9. Needless to say, the learned Tribunal shall proceed to decide the matter uninfluenced by the impugned order or the present order. 10. The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Pending applications also stand disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J JANUARY 12, 2026 “SK” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:29:47