DHANIRAM v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PARALLEL DEOBAND BRANCH DIVISION ROORKEE
WPSS/2001/2024 · 2026-02-26
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4774 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4774 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
26.02.2026
WPSS No. 2001 of 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ishwari Dutt Paliwal, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.
2. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 26.02.2026 Mahinder/