Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47739 (CAL)

RAJU HOSSAIN @ RAJU ALI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/672/2026 · 2026-10-08

Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 Court No.7 Item No.15 AP HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 672 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No.254 of 2026 dated 27.05.2026 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Raju Hossain @ Raju Ali and Anr. …. Petitioners. Mr. Hillol Saha Podder …for the Petitioners. Mr. Avrojyoti Das, APP Ms. Suman Sehanabis Mr. Shyamal Barman …for the State. 1. The petitioners have met the investigating officer as directed by this Court on 29th September, 2026. 2. In light of the above, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 3. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under NDPS Act, Cooch Behar and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when summoned until completion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Sahebganj Police Station 2 without prior permission of the Officer-in-Charge of the Sahebganj Police Station and shall furnish their current address and contact numbers to him and on further condition that the petitioners shall surrender their passport, if any, before the Investigating Officer and on further condition that the petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. 4. In the event the petitioners fail to comply with the aforesaid conditions as enshrined hereinabove, the bail of the petitioners shall automatically stand cancelled without any further reference to this Court. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)