- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2668 MFA No. 2266 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2266 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. K. R. RAJU, S/O K.H.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O NO.1663, SRI.MARUTHI FARM, NEAR IMPACT COLLEGE, AMCO LAYOUT, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 092. 2. SRI. K.A.NARENDRA BABU, S/O K.H.ANJINAPPA, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, NO.8, VENKATAMMA LAYOUT, TINDLU MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 560 097. 3. SIDDAGANGADHARA A., S/O K.H.ANJINAPPA, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O NO.1662, FARM HOUSE, NEAR IMPACT COLLEGE, AMCO LAYOUT, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 092. 4. SRI. SHIVASHANKAR, S/O K.H.ANJINAPPA, AGE: 50 YEARS, R/O NO.547/4, I FLOOR, A-BLOCK, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2668 MFA No. 2266 of 2017 SAHAKARNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 092. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR C. CHANASPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 3. JOINT COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, YELAHANKA DIVISION, BYTARAYAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 092. 4. MILITARY DIARY FARM, SY.NO.15 AND 16 OF KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 092. REPRESENTED BY ITS CARNAL, SRI. RAGHAV-560 092. AND OFFICE AT BALLARI ROAD, HEBBAL, BENGALURU - 560 024 5. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENSE, NEW DELHI - 110 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; R3 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED SRI. NITHIN B.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A CHANDRACHUD, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2668 MFA No. 2266 of 2017 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 (r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri. Chandrashekar C. Chanaspur, counsel for the appellants, appeared in person and submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the submission. The submission regarding the appeal having become infructuous is placed on record. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17