Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4771 (UTT)

SURESH PRASAD PAINULY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/531/2024 · 2026-01-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:414 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 5 3 1 / 2 0 2 4 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for UPNL. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are unanimous on the point that similar issue has been dealt with by this Court in Writ Petition No. 693 of 2024 (SS) and other connected petitions. 3. In view of the consensus between the parties, the writ petition is decided in terms of judgment dated 11.12.2025, rendered in WPSS No. 693 of 2024. 4. If petitioners make representation(s) to Secretary (Finance) within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within four months thereafter. 5. Till decision is taken on petitioners representation(s), engagement of petitioners shall not be discontinued. 6. Artificial break given to them shall be liable to be ignored while considering claim of the petitioners. It shall be open to the petitioners to raise other grievances also in the representation. 7. Let a certified copy of this order be issued today itself, as per rule. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.01.2026 Mahinder/ 2026:UHC:414