- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4446 RSA No. 766 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 766 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. RAVIPRAKASH S/O LATE VEERAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS REISIDENT OF BALLADKA HOUSE GUTHIGARU VILLAGE AND POST SULLIA TALUK D.K.-574 218 2. PADMAVATHI W/O LATE VEERAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDENT OF BALLADKA HOUSE GUTHIGARU VILLAGE AND POST SULLIA TALUK, D.K.-574 218 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARISH M.G., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. K M DAMAYANTHI WIFE OF MANJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/OF KONABANAHALLI HETTUR HOBLI AND POST SAKALESHPRUA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573123 2. G.S. MAHESH KUMAR SON OF SHESHAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDENTOF PALKA HOUSE GUTHIGARU VILALGE SULLIA TALUK Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4446 RSA No. 766 of 2024 D K DISTRICT 574218 3. PADMANABHA GOWDA SON OF SHESHAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESDING AT ENJINADKA HOUSE BAJATHUR VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK D.K. DISTRICT 574 241 4. JAYANTHI WIFE OF NEELAYYA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDENT OF NILLIKALLU HOUSE BAJATHUR VILALGE AND POST BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K DISTRICT 574 214 5. SAVITHA PAIKA WIFE OF SUBBAYYA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDENT OF GUTHIGARU VILLAGE AND POST SULLIA TALUK D K DISTRICT 577 182 6. G RADHAVANI WIFE OF THIMMA SHETTY R/OF ARADANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST VIA PAMPAURA NANJANAGUD TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT 571301 7. CHANDRAVATHI WIFE OF NARAYANA RAI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/OF GUTHIGARU VILLAGE AND POST SULLIA TALUK D K DISTRICT 574218 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R7) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2024 PASSED IN RA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4446 RSA No. 766 of 2024 NO.2/2020 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA, D.K., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.11.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.40/2011 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SULLIA, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30