Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2133 RSA No. 776 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 776 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN:
1. NANJAMANI W/O LATE MALLANNA AGED 55 YEARS
2.
M. MAHESHA S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
3. BASAVARAJU S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
4. NANDINI D/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
5. YOGESHA S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
6. LOKESHA S/O LATE MALLANNA AGED 24 YEARS
7. BHAVANI D/O LATE MALLANNA AGED 21 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUDDAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI NANJANAGUD TALUK 571301 &APPELLANTS (BY SRI AKASH B SHETTY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2133 RSA No. 776 of 2024
AND:
SHIVARAMAPPA S/O LATE MADAPPA AGED 69 YEARS, HALLARE VILALGE, HULLANA HALLI HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK 571314 &RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, WITH A PRAYER TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN RA.NO.5/2018 AND RA.NO.6/2018 ON FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SOMAVARAPETE, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 5th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 96